Post-detection Situations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== Post-Detection Scenarios === | === Post-Detection Scenarios === | ||
=== Post-Detection Scenarios === | === Post-Detection Scenarios === | ||
Revision as of 20:02, 30 October 2025
Post-Detection Scenarios
Post-Detection Scenarios
|- | YEAR | "Scenario Title" | User:YourName | A#-B#-C#-D#-E#-F#-G#-H#-I#-J#-K#-L#-M#-N# | [Detection round text] | [Interpretation round text] | [Understanding round text] | [Meta tags / notes]
| Year | Scenario Title | Author | Permutation Type (A–N) | Detection Round (≤150 words) | Interpretation Round (≤150 words, facilitator only) | Understanding Round (≤150 words, facilitator only) | Meta Tags / Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | "Venus Anomaly Helix" | User:ExampleContributor | A3-B2-C3-D2-E2-F1-G5-H1-I2-J2-K2-L3-M1-N1 | During a data-mining contest held by an educational nonprofit, a student's AI assistant flagged an anomaly in archived telemetry data from a decades-old orbiter mission to Venus. The anomaly structurally resembled a stylized helix embedded physically as an energy oscillation pattern within the waveform of the orbiter’s original communication signal. | The pattern contained minimal decipherable content from a human perspective and no contextual clues, was of very short duration, and was later judged to be probably unintentionally emitted. | Later investigation of the pattern’s characteristics suggested a synthetic, non-biological source: possibly a byproduct of a passing technological artifact. The apparent absence of any harmful interference or neutrally disruptive effects led to a probably benign assessment. | AI anomaly, Venus, benign contact |